Doctor Who Season 5: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 44: Line 44:
*
*


(First watched 2016-06-20, then totally forgot about and rewatched for the first time 2023-11-27, )
(First watched 2016-06-20, then totally forgot about and rewatched for the first time 2023-11-27, -29, )


"No plants, no carbon dioxide." As I suspected, searching this up it is one of the famous boners in Doctor Who science.
"No plants, no carbon dioxide." As I suspected, searching this up it is one of the famous boners in Doctor Who science.
The second one is the first I've watched of the animated recreations. And... it's OK? 2D animation with skeleton, kind of the Live2D look, something you might expect from a moderately well put together indie video game? If it were a new animated show it would seem very cheap, but as its purpose is really to be a replacement for the fan-made reconstructions made out of things like publicity stills, it's a massive improvement in watchability. Regarding the actual contents of the second episode... the ice warrior seemed kind of surprised that he was able to be revived. I guess they hadn't yet decided that was their thing? And the big secret to his revival was just... being warmed up by electricity.


---
---
[[Category:Doctor Who Seasons]]
[[Category:Doctor Who Seasons]]