Doctor Who Series 3: Difference between revisions

Doctor Who Series 3 (view source)

Revision as of 22:18, 29 September 2007

1,356 bytes added , 29 September 2007

no edit summary

JoshuaJSlone

Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Administrators

559

edits

@@ Line 109: / Line 109: @@
 trillion years: Isn't that... quite a bit? &nbsp;I'm not Mr. Cosmology, but considering the sort of end-of-the-universe theories I've read of, I'd think there should not only not be stars around, but matter as we know it. &nbsp;Apart from that, 100 trillion years and humans still look just as they do now?
+---
+: [[2007]] [[September 28]]
+(First watched 2007-09-28) &nbsp;Wow, a great mid part. &nbsp;Having now seen the Master more... I like him. &nbsp;He's got a sense of fun like the Doctor, but without the scruples; the kind of hammy villain that's just fun to watch.
+We thought Cybermen vs Daleks throughout the world was big, but... a worldwide invasion by those ball things, one for each human? &nbsp;Yikes. &nbsp;Will they really kill off 10% of the population? &nbsp;It surely seems possible.
+I wonder how things go next episode. &nbsp;It seems there'd be enough content to have it all happen in the present day, but that leaves a lot dangling about 100 trillion years in the future; what about Utopia, what about the Futurekind? &nbsp;Certainly the cannibalized TARDIS and its currently being locked between only those two time destinations implies they will be going back before status quo is resumed.
+So the Master turned the Doctor old by using the reverse of Lazarus's youthing technology... but that shit turned Lazarus irreversably into a monster. &nbsp;So it doesn't seem there'd be an easy cure for the Doctor, though I imagine they'll explain it away either by &quot;Oh, the Master's work isn't nearly as sloppy as a human's would be.&quot; or &quot;Oh, the Doctor's physiology isn't nearly as corruptible as a human's would be.&quot;
 ---